Are we humans simply remodelled apes? Chimps with a tweak? Is the difference between our genomes so minuscule it justifies the argument that our cognition and behaviour must also differ from chimps by barely a whisker? If “chimps are us” should we grant them human rights? Or is this one of the biggest fallacies in the study of evolution? NOT A CHIMP argues that these similarities have been grossly over-exaggerated - we should keep chimps at arm’s length. Are humans cognitively unique after all?
Thursday, 4 June 2009
My Monkey Baby
In "Not A Chimp" I deal very strongly with the phenomenon of anthropomorphism - our ability to identify with and attribute human mental abilities to our pets and other animals. It has led to over 200 chimpanzees being kept in homes as pets in the USA, together with thousands of monkeys of a variety of species. Keeping chimps in your home is potentially perilous - as my opening chapter describes - when the cuddly chimp abandons its sociable behaviour to reveal itself as a dangerous wild animal. The anthropomorphism projected onto primate pets can often reach bizarre levels as a documentary titled My Monkey Baby on the UK's Channel 4 amply demonstrated on Tuesday night last. Here two American couples and a single woman were shown keeping monkeys as baby substitutes. Diapers, frilly dresses, junk food, sharing a bed - you name it, they did it. Lori and Jim kept a capuchin monkey as a daughter named Jessica Marie. As Jim said, "If I hear someone call her a monkey, I throw a fit. She is my daughter, 100%". 'Nuff said..... If you want to watch this treacly film about profound delusion click on the Channel 4 link above.
No comments:
Post a Comment